4 ms·
> The point I disagree with (and I think the original post is making) is just because an unpopular group (WSB) is interested in something, doesn’t discredit it.
by this_user 4y ago
> The point I disagree with (and I think the original post is making) is just because an unpopular group (WSB) is interested in something, doesn’t discredit it.
If that groups has consistently been wrong about everything for two years, then it absolutely does. It's like Jim Cramer: If he states something, there is at least a 90% chance that the opposite will happen.
- qwytw 4y ago> there is at least a 90% chance that the opposite will happen. That'd be cool. You could make a lot of money. Unfortunately he's probably closer to 50%.
- rcarr 4y agoThey’re at 60% of the float locked up with DRS now. Once they get to 100% then the true measure of whether they were right or wrong can be ascertained.