2 ms·
It's like code completion on steroids, still lacks depth and detail. It can create code mashup and glue it perfectly in no time, so it's worth a lot as most of
by kmac_ 4y ago
It's like code completion on steroids, still lacks depth and detail. It can create code mashup and glue it perfectly in no time, so it's worth a lot as most of the dev work looks like that. So I predict that it will be a standard tool at some point. Still, it will require a skilled dev that understands what to ask and how to interpret the answers. If somebody would ask me if I agree to be operated by a "junior" surgeon who is helped by such "AI" I would said no.
- skydhash 4y agoNot really unless you’re stuck on a problem. And it may be better to google it and find the original solution and its context. It is hard to read code because you have to recreate the abstract model of the program in your head so you can understand it. Imagine doing that for AI’s code you can’t really trust because its provenance is not related to a real context, but something constructed with your ambiguous prompt.