4 ms·

Here’s a summary from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cvs-lawsuit-idUSKBN1YL1UW https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cvs-lawsuit-idUSKBN1YL1UW Edit:

Here’s a summary from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cvs-lawsuit-idUSKBN1YL1UW https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cvs-lawsuit-idUSKBN1YL1UW Edit: Never mind, this is a different lawsuit.

etchalon 4y ago
This looks to be a completely different case.
- DHPersonal 4y ago
  Oh, sorry! I thought I had picked the right one.
vageli 4y ago
That is a different case. The OP is about CVS using in-store customer donations to satisfy a legal obligation they had to ADA. > CVS did not merely collect customers’ Campaign Donations and forward them to the ADA, but, instead, counted Campaign Donations toward the satisfaction of a legally binding obligation, which CVS had made to the ADA, to donate $10 million to the ADA during the threeyear period of 2021 through 2023 (the “CVS Obligation”) Court filing here: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/New_York_Eastern_District_Court/1--22-cv-03116/McCabe_v._CVS_Health_Corporation/1/ https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/New_York_Eastern_District_...
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]