I used many combinations and I was impressed that even with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors it got the point of the questions I asked. It's "knowledge"

I used many combinations and I was impressed that even with spelling mistakes and grammatical errors it got the point of the questions I asked. It's "knowledge" was only surface level which I could have easily just searched Wikipedia to get. I thought it's code refactoring ability was on par with the static analysis tools out there at the moment. In terms of an actual conversation it was woefully inadequate. The feeling I got was like using a chatbot on a website for a bank vs actually phoning and speaking to a person. It was like just canned responses it was giving me all the time rather than any real interaction. Also note that even on the website it says it gets stuff incredibly wrong every now and then. I didn't see this but I could imagine not wanting to use something like this on your banks website for that exact reason e.g. legal liability. I do applaud the creators giving even the smallest of thoughts to ethics here in that you can't ask it how to make a bomb and suchlike otherwise it'll tell you nope.