3 ms·
Concerning my opinion, we need to use criteria which separates fair and not fair use. It should be the same as with human artist. If you use others' work as ins
by solomatov 4y ago
Concerning my opinion, we need to use criteria which separates fair and not fair use. It should be the same as with human artist. If you use others' work as inspiration or in a transformative way it's fair use, but if you plainly copy others' work it's a copyright infringement. We need to teach this to ML models like we teach it for artists.
P.S. I am not a lawyer.
- baandam 4y agoIMO the issue is that an artist does not have copyright on a style. "Salvador Dali style painting" does not violate Dali's copyright any more than Dali violated the copyright of his surrealist influences. It is like saying music made with guitar/bass/drums/vocals violates The Beatles copyright. No matter how remote, the influence of The Beatles is in the "training data" at this point with that configuration. Stable Diffusion would have nothing on a band like Oasis violating The Beatles copyright if we want to go down this road of artist copyrighting a style. It is nonsense.