4 ms·
For humans, this is science. It's hard, time-consuming, often expensive and limited, involves ethics and consent, and gets a lot of wrong answers anyway. So I
by nonameiguess 4y ago
For humans, this is science. It's hard, time-consuming, often expensive and limited, involves ethics and consent, and gets a lot of wrong answers anyway.
So I guess we need to get to the point where you give an AI a prompt without a known answer, and instead of confidently spewing bullshit, it can propose a research study, get it funded, find subjects, and complete the study.
Of course, there are easy forms of "science." I just asked it "Is it cloudy in Dallas?" It answered:
It can be cloudy in Dallas. The city experiences both sunny and cloudy days throughout the year.
That is true, but not an answer. It is cloudy and I can conduct the very simple experiment of looking at the sky to get that answer.
- darreninthenet 4y agoHowever is this not a known limitation with how it's currently setup? It has no way of knowing what the current weather in Dallas is simply because it has no way of finding out (eg it could query a weather website, but it has no internet browsing yet)... to be an accurate comparison you'd need to repeat your simple experiment blindfolded.
- Jensson 4y agoHow would you make it navigate an api? We don't even know how to make it perform basic arithmetic's correctly, it is an enormous black box model so we can't just inject code into.