2 ms·
>A reduction in the number of cyclists on streets; Really a goal of the move. For sure there's a reduction, article suggests 15-40% which jives for me. So long
by incomingpain 4y ago
>A reduction in the number of cyclists on streets;
Really a goal of the move. For sure there's a reduction, article suggests 15-40% which jives for me. So long as a bikes are allowed on the road, you will have movements to punish cyclists. Soon as a city has bike pathes all over enabling you to get to your destination and banning cyclists off the road and sidewalks. Then this problem will be solved.
Bike sharing systems basically cant function where bike helmets are mandatory. Which is super interesting because how many people really just ignore the bike helmet rule anyway?
>More exposure among vulnerable populations to unnecessary interactions with police.
Police brutality is a huge problem for the USA. Not anyone else.