> you're just opening up the toddler argument That's not the only thing you are doing. You are also creating an opportunity for false positives to justifiably

> you're just opening up the toddler argument That's not the only thing you are doing. You are also creating an opportunity for false positives to justifiably challenge their bans. If you are going to keep the user's money, I think you absolutely have to provide recourse for false positives because otherwise what you are doing is simply theft.