The title said "evolutionary response" not active response, which is a fine term in that regard, but others said enough to that. However, I don't get how this

The title said "evolutionary response" not active response, which is a fine term in that regard, but others said enough to that. However, I don't get how this is anything clickbaity here over your title, please explain! Its almost Godwins-law-like now that every article mentioning evolution will have this nitpicking.. Is it pedantic monday already again?