Graham is often reporting (presenting observations) of facts that are overlooked by the mainstream. He has spent a lot of time and money and travelled-widely ga

Graham is often reporting (presenting observations) of facts that are overlooked by the mainstream. He has spent a lot of time and money and travelled-widely gathering those observations. As with any hypothesis, people will disagree with the interpretation of the observations. That's how the game works, and how science advances one funeral at a time. (Plate tectonics for one fine old example. The YDIH for a much more recent other.) Sometimes evidence is ignored because it can't be right. (For example, no skeletons 7 or more feet tall have been found in North America ... 'those newspaper stories, all hokum'. Or, anyone who radio-dates bones at human sites in NA that are 24k or 130k or 200k years old has simply made a mistake. 'Incompetent. Take away their funding.' Or, it's our consensual opinion that it's most likely that the natives killed all the megafauna for food.) Graham (for one) has a real knack for looking at a lot of ignored evidence, pulling those pieces together and presenting hypotheses that often pass the Occam test. I've learned a lot reading of his discoveries. As to the 'truth' of it all, time will tell (or the coverups go on). Funny seeing the insiders getting all riled.