3 ms·
That's what I figured too — and it's VERY good at making connections for us in our field - connections we just recently figured out on our own. So we'll be usin
by yawnxyz 4y ago
That's what I figured too — and it's VERY good at making connections for us in our field - connections we just recently figured out on our own. So we'll be using it a lot more as "jazz"; as a way to just bounce off a bunch of weird, crazy, outlandish ideas without running any experiments or even waste time discussing. Most of these will be outlandish ideas we'd never even voice — and maybe one or two won't seem so outlandish to ChatGPT — those are the ones we might bring up in lab meeting and actually try. There's SO many different things to try, I think Chat will really help us narrow down our scope.
I'm really excited for this new way of working!
With that said, I half expected it to know more about our individual papers. Somehow, it does not.
- JonChesterfield 4y agoA near optimal way of bounding research to that which is already known, no?
- Terretta 4y agoThis isn't being talked about, but ... If you play with and get a feel for the text 2 image generations, that "compress" 5 billion images into a 16GB model that coherent pictures can be probabilistically generated from, you can apply that "feel" to the language probabilistic generations -- and trust them about as much. You're staring at a lovely image, decide to ignore eight fingers on the left hand, and not till five minutes later realize your hero has three legs. For the purpose you describe, that works though!