3 ms·
I played with ChatGPT today. It doesn't replace Google or SO today, and based on the types of issues with what it generated, ChatGPT is not going to replace a
by __d 4y ago
I played with ChatGPT today. It doesn't replace Google or SO today, and based on the types of issues with what it generated, ChatGPT is not going to replace a competent programmer any time soon.
Where I fear you might be right though, is that the web in general (and so, Google) and sites like SO with their internal content, will inevitably lose value as people post ChatGPT-generated content which superficially looks reasonable, but is subtly wrong. Wading through all those subtly-wrong things looking for the actual answer will be a far worse experience than today.
Which is unfortunate. I don't see a good way to avoid it, sadly. SO's attempt to ban ChatGPT-generated content is useless: while people have the incentive to try to get kudos from SO, and ChatGPT requires skilled, detailed analysis to detect its errors, the ban is unenforceable.
- gardenhedge 4y agoI woke up today and decided to ask ChatGPT something instead of Googling it. It worked perfectly for my query. A version of ChatGPT that has access to the web (can crawl, can link to content) will be a big blow for google.
- ZephyrBlu 4y agoA version of ChatGPT with internet access that can crawl the web and link things is fundamentally different to the version that exists today.