2 ms·
Three and a half hours? Just the first half hour exceeded my tolerance for whiny disingenuity. The stone boxes in the Serapeum suffice to show that the copper
by moloch-hai 4y ago
Three and a half hours? Just the first half hour exceeded my tolerance for whiny disingenuity.
The stone boxes in the Serapeum suffice to show that the copper tooling presented is laughably inadequate. Pretending otherwise, apparently just to avoid admitting ignorance of the real method, is disingenuous.
We really don't have any clue how they could have done that work. Certainly nothing found has been up to the job. What would be so bad about admitting that? It would be much better than lying.
- Hikikomori 4y agoAt 1:27, thought I linked to the correct place. 2:09 for the boxes in the same video Are archeologists suggesting that they used copper chisels for very hard stone?
- moloch-hai 4y agoAt issue is that the surfaces are perfectly flat and parallel, the rims exactly 90 degrees. Archaeologists won't even discuss it.
- Hikikomori 4y agoAs shown in the video they are not perfect 90 degree angles.