3 ms·
It's damning evidence enough that Netflix aren't having an expert on the show, isn't it?
by posterboy 4y ago
It's damning evidence enough that Netflix aren't having an expert on the show, isn't it?
- moloch-hai 4y agoMight depend on whether they were invited and declined. But inventing spurious ad hominem accusations instead of offering a plausible counter-narrative is not a good look.
- epgui 4y agoWhat exactly are you referring to when you say “ad hominem accusations”? I don’t follow.
- moloch-hai 4y agoCalling him racist.
- epgui 4y agoThey don't call him racist. Read the referenced material carefully.
- moloch-hai 4y agohttps://boingboing.net/2022/11/27/archaeologists-reveal-the-white-supremacist-nonsense-behind-netflixs-ancient-apocalypse.html https://boingboing.net/2022/11/27/archaeologists-reveal-the-...
- epgui 4y agoEven that article does not call the guy racist. Please point to me a sentence or phrase in there that calls the guy racist.
- moloch-hai 4y ago"But the whole theory is steeped in racism and white supremacy, so it's not just harmless entertainment." "He will get to the edge of something, but he won't say it, because he knows that his followers already know it. He can say, 'I didn't say that,' and he didn't say it, but everyone knew what he said because it was already known, right?" How much accusation do you need?