Not OP, but dialectics not dialects. Here's how I interpret it: The phrase dialectics of power is framing the concept that a lot of a political discourse is ce

Not OP, but dialectics not dialects. Here's how I interpret it: The phrase dialectics of power is framing the concept that a lot of a political discourse is centered around arguments of who has power, and who doesn't. Its superficial arguing. "Oh no, X has won the house that means the future of Y is in peril!" instead of discussion around why X won the house or why idea Y is something we want in our future. Much of this line of thinking is about making sweeping assumptions about policies, and what groups of people/political organizations believe and support.