> Hancock is one of those people who sounds reasonable at first. Then as you keep going it gets worse and worse. I'm reminded of someone describing Velikovsky,

> Hancock is one of those people who sounds reasonable at first. Then as you keep going it gets worse and worse. I'm reminded of someone describing Velikovsky, who wrote some pretty far-out books which conveyed radical views of archaeology and astronomy. Paraphrased: "If you ask astronomers about the archaeology, they say it seems interesting enough, but the astronomy is bullshit. If you ask archaeologists, they'll tell you the astronomical theories are plausible but the archaeology is bunk."