Wow, that's probably the worst response you could have made. First, the CERN example was a counter-example. If you say "A implies B" and that someone shows an

Wow, that's probably the worst response you could have made. First, the CERN example was a counter-example. If you say "A implies B" and that someone shows an example where A does not imply B, it does not matter if this is just one example, it still demonstrates that your affirmation is bullshit. Second, you cannot just say "let's just pretend that the rest of the world just works like I want. See, I'm therefore right". If "cern" is just a part of "science", then, it's YOUR JOB to give me the demonstration that the rest of science is different. Until then, your affirmation is the one that is pseudo-science. Until now, all we have is, on one side, someone who has experience in science and who has provided a mechanism to explain why your affirmation is bullshit + a specific counter-example. And on the other side, someone who has just made some big affirmation with nothing below it. Sorry, but I'm pretty sure that everyone can see that you have absolutely nothing to defend your affirmation that was just motivated by a childish "I'm a computer scientist, so my methods are the best, and I'm offended that someone can say that these methods are great in many cases but not in all, so I will invent reasons to pretend they are somehow wrong"