4 ms·
I did literally mention their interiors. They're shit for the price range. I also disagree. I can choose to spend my money how I wish. There are plenty of servi
by wcarron 4y ago
I did literally mention their interiors. They're shit for the price range. I also disagree. I can choose to spend my money how I wish. There are plenty of serviceable vehicles and Tesla/Elon's anti-union stance is a perfectly legitimate reason to not buy their cars.
- redox99 4y ago> I did literally mention their interiors. You said you would never purchase one of their vehicles, which to me means that even if they "improved their interiors" you wouldn't buy them. > I can choose to spend my money how I wish. Obviously you can spend your money in a way that is not optimal from a game theory perspective. That doesn't mean it isn't "a bit silly". Also the CEOs of other companies you would actually consider buying, might be "worse" by whatever metric you use. It's just that they don't display their personality and management style on Twitter so you just don't know.
- wcarron 4y ago> You said you would never purchase one of their vehicles, which to me means that even if they "improved their interiors" you wouldn't buy them. That is correct. > That doesn't mean it isn't "a bit silly". Real life isn't a simplified game theory scenario presented by some undergrad college professor. Good god. Your stance is frankly ridiculous. I could easily name a dozen more reasons not to buy a Tesla. Life is a grey soup of decision-making. Is it silly to buy organic? Is it silly to be a vegetarian? Is it not silly to spend money on a luxury vehicle when a bicycle and Kia forte will suffice? People have numerous and varying motivations for purchase decisions and it is almost never as constrained and mathematically straightforward as A^2 + B^2 = C^2