3 ms·
The author is Aristotle.[a] I prefer the translation hosted by MIT at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/athenian_const.1.1.html http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotl
by cs702 4y ago
The author is Aristotle.[a] I prefer the translation hosted by MIT at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/athenian_const.1.1.html http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/athenian_const.1.1.html instead of the OP's translation, hosted by an organization that many people consider highly ideological and politically divisive.[b]
In the translation hosted by MIT, Aristotle starts with this:
> After this event there was contention for a long time between the upper classes and the populace. Not only was the constitution at this time oligarchical in every respect, but the poorer classes, men, women, and children, were the serfs of the rich. They were known as Pelatae and also as Hectemori, because they cultivated the lands of the rich at the rent thus indicated. The whole country was in the hands of a few persons, and if the tenants failed to pay their rent they were liable to be haled into slavery, and their children with them. All loans secured upon the debtor's person, a custom which prevailed until the time of Solon, who was the first to appear as the champion of the people. But the hardest and bitterest part of the constitution in the eyes of the masses was their state of serfdom. Not but what they were also discontented with every other feature of their lot; for, to speak generally, they had no part nor share in anything.
Aristotle wrote this 2372 years ago. Go read the whole thing. It will make you appreciate that many societal problems we have today are... not new.
--
[a] It may have been written by one of his pupils.
[b] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Fund https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Fund
- lo_zamoyski 4y ago> hosted by an organization that many people consider highly ideological and politically divisive. Isn't your remark itself divisive? We should be paying attention to ideas and verifying them, not flirting with ad hominem. The last thing we need to encourage is more emotionalism and prejudice. > It will make you appreciate that many societal problems we have today are... not new. Indeed, as the famous passage from Ecclesiastes says, there nothing new under the sun. Another text worth reading is "The Republic" in which there is an analysis of the stages of political decadence which are also discernible in our own times[0][1]. [0] https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1562889060602916864.html https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1562889060602916864.html [1] https://americanmind.org/salvo/woke-ideology-is-a-psychological-disorder/ https://americanmind.org/salvo/woke-ideology-is-a-psychologi...
- cs702 4y ago> Isn't your remark itself divisive? I link to an easy-to-verify source, so, no, I don't think that remark is divisive. > We should be paying attention to ideas and verifying them, not flirting with ad hominem. The last thing we need to encourage is more emotionalism and prejudice. Couldn't agree more!