I found curious but also alarming how people prove to be unable to separate a certain implementation of a technology from the technology itself. Like "digital

I found curious but also alarming how people prove to be unable to separate a certain implementation of a technology from the technology itself. Like "digital means modern platforms with a craptop on our knees"... Oh, yes such IT involution is commercial crap, but that's not IT and the answer is not "going back" but study what we have had in the past, like original desktop computing vision vs the commercial implementation for the masses and correct mistakes instead of dreaming playing Amish...