3 ms·
>As far as I remember, it was still possible (in terms of banking systems/santions) to pay the gas in Euros as usual; Russia decided, unilaterally, that they wo
by Normille 4y ago
>As far as I remember, it was still possible (in terms of banking systems/santions) to pay the gas in Euros as usual; Russia decided, unilaterally, that they would require the payment to be in Rubles (to try and limit its plummeting value)...
That's a bit disingenuous, ins't it?
Maybe you're right and EU/UK could still have paid in Euros but, with Russia being frozen out of the world's banking system, they [Russia] wouldn't have actually been able to access the money. So it pretty much amounts to the same thing. They'd be giving the gas away.
If you were working on a job for someone and suddenly had your bank accounts frozen, it wouldn't be unreasonable for you to tell the person employing you that, while you were happy to keep on working, since you couldn't access your bank account, you'd need to be paid in cash for the rest of your time.
And you'd rightly feel aggrieved if that person refused, but then put it about that you were an unreliable worker who'd walked off the job.
- gattilorenz 4y agoI’d say it’s more disingenuous not to consider that, if they had retired from the sovereign ground of Ukraine, they could have easily spent that money. But in any case, as disingenuous as it might be, it’s more factually correct than the post I was responding to.