> Overall this data collection was being done in a privacy respecting way and yet, I read > Luzzi had claimed the devices were secure and the data encrypted,

> Overall this data collection was being done in a privacy respecting way and yet, I read > Luzzi had claimed the devices were secure and the data encrypted, but Privacy Institute students learned they were relatively insecure and unencrypted ... > Which is illegal since it isn't their property. and yet, I read > deployed without IRB approval even though human subjects were at the center of the so-called study For me, this is was perhaps the most important message, > many members of the computer science department were also in a union, and thus networked together for a quick mass response.