2 ms·
Isn't that what critics mean when they say that such systems don't have "genuine understanding"? They have no knowledge of their lack of knowledge, and they hav
by YeGoblynQueenne 4y ago
Isn't that what critics mean when they say that such systems don't have "genuine understanding"? They have no knowledge of their lack of knowledge, and they have no knowledge of the existence of such a thing as knowledge. They are big tables of tokens with probabilities that humans ascribe knowledge or intelligence to, for reasons similar to our ability to see the face of Jesus on a slice of bread etc.
They can output text, but it takes a human to understand it (genuinely or not).
- ogogmad 4y agoIf it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it's a duck. > They are big tables of tokens with probabilities And we're just a bunch of carbon atoms. Let yourself feel wonder.
- nebukhadnezzar 4y agoGPT can not ground its statements into reality
- YeGoblynQueenne 4y agoWhat is "a duck"? P.S. Note I didn't say "just". That assumption is all yours.