6 ms·
To make claims that the communications were encrypted when the survieled in question were a room full of researchers capable of dumping and reversing the firmwa
by pushedx 4y ago
To make claims that the communications were encrypted when the survieled in question were a room full of researchers capable of dumping and reversing the firmware is beyond stupid.
The administration should be held to account simply for that lie alone.
- shapefrog 4y ago"we submitted for approval" - "we didnt submit for approval" - "we dont need approval" That is a more egregious lie - I congratulate whoever pitched the "human resarch subject" argument and managed to walk the administration into a poorly thought out sequence of lies. > Luzzi says that they submitted a proposal to the Institutional Review Board (IRB)—which ensures that human research subject's rights and welfare are protected—only to admit that this never happened when a faculty member reveals the IRB never received any submission.