2 ms·

Then great, that is consistent. I just doubt that would be the case. I think the actual justification for banning one political side is not "it's a private comp

by proc0 4y ago

Then great, that is consistent. I just doubt that would be the case. I think the actual justification for banning one political side is not "it's a private company", but rather "it allows our side to win".

dragonwriter 4y ago
> I think the actual justification for banning one political side is not “it’s a private company” That wasn’t the claimed justification. (That is the reason it is not a violation of Constitutional free speech, but not the reason for the action.)
jshen 4y ago
No one banned one political side except Fox News