> In October, Meta told managers to mark 15% of its employees as "needs support" in what workers dubbed "quiet layoffs," > The search engine giant also changed

> In October, Meta told managers to mark 15% of its employees as "needs support" in what workers dubbed "quiet layoffs," > The search engine giant also changed its employee performance rating system this year, telling managers they were now expected to mark 6% of its employees — more than 10,000 people — in the lowest performance tiers, Obviously that sort of mindlessly uniform cuts are bad. But, are they bad bad, or "worst option except everything else that's been tried" bad?