4 ms·
you could easily achieve double, triple, or even quadruple co-located redundancy for far less than what s3 would charge for 40TB. Before anyone replies about n
by throwaway64 15y ago
you could easily achieve double, triple, or even quadruple co-located redundancy for far less than what s3 would charge for 40TB.
Before anyone replies about needing a "24/7 sysadmin", if you are running stuff at this scale:
A) You already have a sysdmin, or somebody competent enough to
do the setup/maintenance work. Running off s3 doesn't magically mean you never need deal with sysadmin issues.
B) Rack providers will swap out hardware if you put in a ticket, so you can provide multi-regional redundancy for much much much cheaper than amazon would charge you ($60000*2 for 2 regions gets expensive fast)