4 ms·
the son of 2 tax experts that have helped draft tax legislation, is insinuating that he doesn't know the basics of what makes his actions fraud, and how he want
by newguynewphone 4y ago
the son of 2 tax experts that have helped draft tax legislation, is insinuating that he doesn't know the basics of what makes his actions fraud, and how he wants to distance himself from Alameda, even though he is a 90% owner, just sounds fishy
- pdntspa 4y agoTo say nothing of the fact that he was fucking its CEO. Imagine the pillow talk...
- kryogen1c 4y ago> the son of 2 tax experts I'm no SBF apologist, but this is about the silliest argument you could make. What does what his parents did have anything to do with anything? I don't know anything about my parents' field of expertise.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- bovinejoni 4y agoHis parents are the beneficial owners of Bahamas real estate purchased with FTX funds, allegedly for “employee purposes”. This all looks really bad
- thedudeabides5 4y agoHis parents were both employed by the company and (imho) obviously still providing legal services in a world where all his lawyers dropped him. He's not dumb, everyone is just taking the bait.
- c0m 4y agoHis father, Joe Bankman, was heavily involved in FTX from very early on, being the firm's first lawyer. Here he is saying as much in his own words: https://youtu.be/MmmXUtRt6xo?t=2140 https://youtu.be/MmmXUtRt6xo?t=2140
- Dma54rhs 4y agoI had the same thought but actually his parents took part of it, they are not just his innocent parents.
- harambae 4y agoDo you have any additional info on this? (Beyond the fact that SBF bought real estate in the Bahamas for his parents, which is indirectly damning) I don't doubt it, just curious what the evidence is.