4 ms·
> that I don't know of any court interpreting "steals" in a statute to mean "making an unauthorized copy of" or "leaking" Is there some reason you would know t
by eggnet 4y ago
> that I don't know of any court interpreting "steals" in a statute to mean "making an unauthorized copy of" or "leaking"
Is there some reason you would know this? Intellectual property and classified information are things. You can steal them.
- dane-pgp 4y ago> Intellectual property So-called "intellectual property" is neither intellectual nor property. If I randomly mash the keyboard for a few minutes, the resulting jumble of letters can have its redistribution restricted by copyright law, despite not requiring any intellectual feat to produce. It is also not property, since I cannot own ideas that exist within your head or the sound waves that emanate from your mouth when you whistle a tune I wrote. > You can steal them. No you can't. The legal definition of "stealing" requires that the perpetrator takes someone else's property (which an idea isn't) without permission with the intent to deprive them of the property. You can't deprive someone of an idea by making more copies of that idea, much less is that the intent behind copying, so the label of "stealing" is completely inapplicable.