5 ms·
Well you literally said that the article is 'less "secular humanist" and more "religious Conservative pearl-clutching,"' Perhaps that's not strictly branding th
by zeofig 4y ago
Well you literally said that the article is 'less "secular humanist" and more "religious Conservative pearl-clutching,"'
Perhaps that's not strictly branding the author as a religious conservative, but I might go so far as to say that your comment is less "merely raising a point" and more "making baseless assumptions and accusations"
I will refrain from smugly assigning a star-based rating
- 0ct4via 4y agoI said seems, not was. Reading it as appearing in a similar way to the "religious Conservative pearl-clutching" rhetoric is drawing a similarity, not making an absolute declaration. It's neither assuming nor accusing when there's empirical evidence to draw the similarity, and no formal accusation was made. Try sticking to facts, not assumptions and hypocrisy.
- boeingUH60 4y agoFor the sake of peace, we probably should end this argument because it’s going nowhere…but I’ll end it saying that you’re truly a reflection of what you criticize :)
- 0ct4via 4y ago
- boeingUH60 4y agoMust be exhausting being in combative mode with all your comments on this post..