> actions of private entities don't implicate the first amendment. It's worth reviewing calls for censorship coming from private citizens who later assume posi

> actions of private entities don't implicate the first amendment. It's worth reviewing calls for censorship coming from private citizens who later assume positions of influence within government: calls that come after taking office may or may not be punishable. Therefore, any influence exerted during campaigns is interesting to follow. It may or may not be a warning signal for how they operate while in office.