2 ms·
Any source at all? (Good luck finding one that supports your position). FWIW: yes, mining is bad. But uranium is unbelievably energy-dense and the amounts are
by kergonath 4y ago
Any source at all?
(Good luck finding one that supports your position).
FWIW: yes, mining is bad. But uranium is unbelievably energy-dense and the amounts are ridiculously small compared to any other source of energy. All things considered, nuclear causes fewer emissions per MWh than most solar panels (which are not radioactive but still need heaps of metals and semiconductors). Also, there is no contest with coal, oil, and gas, which is the thing that is actually used when you don’t have nuclear energy available.
- mensetmanusman 4y agoMining can be done poorly, it isn’t bad, everything rigid we have comes from mining of some form.
- zelphirkalt 4y agohttps://invidio.xamh.de/watch?v=ioRtzOWm07A https://invidio.xamh.de/watch?v=ioRtzOWm07A Here you go. But really, if you had done a simple search of something like "france uranium africa" you would likely have found this yourself. If you only ever search for things supporting your position, but not the opposite position, you are prone to being in a bubble, never seeing contradicting information.
- shashasha2 4y agoGreenpeace documentary