> What if it is child abuse though? The irony is that this question (and lots of others related to it) is, in fact, amenable to scientific, truth-finding query

> What if it is child abuse though? The irony is that this question (and lots of others related to it) is, in fact, amenable to scientific, truth-finding query. But you stop with "what if" and jump directly to "should". That's exactly the attitude the linked article is trying to correct.