3 ms·
No, OP is correct. * You omitted hist point X. * You misunderstand point Y. * Here's point Z you didn't account for.
by poulpy123 4y ago
No, OP is correct.
* You omitted hist point X.
* You misunderstand point Y.
* Here's point Z you didn't account for.
- goosedragons 4y agoContinuing the discussion of point Z, here's an interesting way[1] it relates back to the OP. And here are some unknown facts[2] the OP didn't include. [1]: http://SomeScientificJournal.com/141421 http://SomeScientificJournal.com/141421 [2]: http://SomeNewsSite.com/11235813 http://SomeNewsSite.com/11235813
- JumpCrisscross 4y agoCuriously, while examples of metacoentary stretch back to antiquity, the concept having a name is modern [1]. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-reference#History-of-the-concept-and-the-term https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meta-reference#History-of-th...
- Justin_K 4y agoThis.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoWell the OP could be both correct and incorrect.