3 ms·

Sorry, that isn't quite as clear as it could be. Here's a link to the page you're looking for: http://priceonomics.com/phones/apple/ http://priceonomics.com/pho

by omarish 15y ago

Sorry, that isn't quite as clear as it could be. Here's a link to the page you're looking for: http://priceonomics.com/phones/apple/ http://priceonomics.com/phones/apple/

forensic 15y ago
Ah, so it's your search feature that is broken.
- omarish 15y ago
  Just pushed a fix. Thanks for your patience.
  - jackpirate 15y ago
    Pushed a fix? He had a major critique of the way search works, not a minor bug report. What could you really have changed in such a short time?
    - patd 15y ago
      I don't know but before criticizing, you could just give it a try. Now searching for "iPhone 4" suggests "Apple iPhone 4" and "Apple iPhone 4S". If they fixed it in such a short time, it was probably a bug and they really pushed a fix...
    - omarish 15y ago
      No, we just work quickly :).
- temphn 15y ago
  You should stop being so rude. It's hard to build something like this, especially when the input data is so noisy.
  - forensic 15y ago
    Rude? I thought I was doing them a favor. Initially I thought their system did not differentiate between specific models: that would majorly impact usefulness. Then when he explained I realized it was just a broken search feature: a much easier thing to fix. I hope most people here don't confuse matter of fact literalism with rudeness. This is HN after all and I'm offering free user feedback to a business, something most businesses greatly appreciate.
- deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]
- deleted 15y ago
  [deleted]