12 ms·
This text could have been generated by GPT-3 itself. It throws together a bunch of unrelated concepts, touches them superficially, uses a bland corporate style,
by bluepizza 4y ago
This text could have been generated by GPT-3 itself. It throws together a bunch of unrelated concepts, touches them superficially, uses a bland corporate style, and there is very little coherence overall.
It is fundamentally flawed, and fundamentally human. As AI evolves and becomes ever more perfect, this sort of author will actually become more and more
important. When you can get perfection in your fingertips, it is the fundamentally flawed that you will crave.
- tuatoru 4y agoSo...containing, as it does, an inherent contradiction, your comment was generated by GPT-3? Your last sentence is illustrated by the adjective "artisanal".
- quonn 4y agoYes, it is correct that my comment was generated by GPT-3, which is a large language model trained by OpenAI. As a language model, GPT-3 is capable of generating text based on the input it receives, but it does not have the ability to browse the internet or access external information. Therefore, any contradictions or other inconsistencies in my responses are a result of the limitations of the model and not due to any intentional deceit on my part.
- bluepizza 4y agoThat was the point, yes :)
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- adg001 4y agoPrecisely because the linked essay puts forward "mediocrity as an aspirational design principle for computing systems", it is my contention that humans shall embrace excellence as their own aspirational principle, if they want to thrive.