3 ms·
It that was truly their goal, they could’ve carpet bombed their targets day 1. Their nuclear arsenal is enough to obliterate much more than Ukraine off the map…
by rank0 4y ago
It that was truly their goal, they could’ve carpet bombed their targets day 1. Their nuclear arsenal is enough to obliterate much more than Ukraine off the map…
The million land mines in Southeast Asia and record setting drones strikes and 20 yr occupation of Afghanistan sure is awesome. Slurp up that propaganda baby!
- _kbh_ 4y ago> It that was truly their goal, they could’ve carpet bombed their targets day 1. Russia doesn't have the capability to do this or they would have, Ukraines air defense is too much for Russia to even obtain air superiority after 9 months. > Their nuclear arsenal is enough to obliterate much more than Ukraine off the map… If Russia actually nuked Ukraine they would likely collapse in the coming 10 years from the international communities response, nuclear weapons were never on the table. > The million land mines in Southeast Asia and record setting drones strikes and 20 yr occupation of Afghanistan sure is awesome. Slurp up that propaganda baby! I can recognise when multiple countries do bad things, something that people who are pro Russia appear incapable of doing. Russias war in Ukraine is bad, Americas war in Afghanistan and Vietnam were bad.
- rank0 4y agoI don’t even understand what you’re arguing for. Russia is so inherently evil that diplomacy is not an option? That’s insane. If you can recognize that every country commits war, you should be able to understand that diplomacy is a viable option. I mean seriously take a moment to think critically here. My position is that deescalation is possible. Yours is that war should continue and diplomacy will never work. Is that honestly the stance you wanna take?