2 ms·

You might want to read the thread again. I believe the word you’re looking for is “bias”. Even if we take Vance out of the picture. My point on the claims being

by xedeon 4y ago

You might want to read the thread again. I believe the word you’re looking for is “bias”. Even if we take Vance out of the picture. My point on the claims being unsubstantiated (so far) still stand. Can you find any source that a governing body has fined Neuralink for factually being complicit based on the claims?

SlickNixon 4y ago
>even if we take Vance out of the picture Pump the brakes. With Vance out of the picture your initial comment is a link to someone's LinkedIn profile. Do you want answers to these questions or are you throwing up flak?
- xedeon 4y ago
  Perhaps you should quickly search "Autumn Sorrells" to see her experience/credentials. Not sure what you're even getting at here.
  - SlickNixon 4y ago
    Why would I need to search for her credentials when you gave me a url to her LinkedIn profile? Are you familiar with the complaint lodged against Neuralink by PCRM? Did you read the Guardian and Business Wire articles that iancmceachern posted? Do you consider the Guardian and Business Wire to be reputable news organizations, and their reporting on the issue and the statements released by PCRM a form of substantiation? Is a link to Autumn Sorrells LinkedIn, a link to Ashlee Vance's wikipedia page, and a couple of tweets by the same intended as a response to any of the above?
    - xedeon 4y ago
      > Do you consider the Guardian and Business Wire to be reputable news organizations No not really. Also, there are no “forms of substantiation”or “grey areas”. Either the allegations will be confirmed true (substantiated) or not (un substantiated) after the adjudication process… So the logical thing to do is wait and see for any ruling to come out. I despise hopping on any speculative bandwagon.
      - SlickNixon 4y ago
        I thought we were assuming everything was on the level on the basis of Autumn Sorrells' credentials?

by xedeon 4y ago

SlickNixon 4y ago

>even if we take Vance out of the picture Pump the brakes. With Vance out of the picture your initial comment is a link to someone's LinkedIn profile. Do you want answers to these questions or are you throwing up flak?

xedeon 4y ago
Perhaps you should quickly search "Autumn Sorrells" to see her experience/credentials. Not sure what you're even getting at here.
- SlickNixon 4y ago
  Why would I need to search for her credentials when you gave me a url to her LinkedIn profile? Are you familiar with the complaint lodged against Neuralink by PCRM? Did you read the Guardian and Business Wire articles that iancmceachern posted? Do you consider the Guardian and Business Wire to be reputable news organizations, and their reporting on the issue and the statements released by PCRM a form of substantiation? Is a link to Autumn Sorrells LinkedIn, a link to Ashlee Vance's wikipedia page, and a couple of tweets by the same intended as a response to any of the above?
  - xedeon 4y ago
    > Do you consider the Guardian and Business Wire to be reputable news organizations No not really. Also, there are no “forms of substantiation”or “grey areas”. Either the allegations will be confirmed true (substantiated) or not (un substantiated) after the adjudication process… So the logical thing to do is wait and see for any ruling to come out. I despise hopping on any speculative bandwagon.
    - SlickNixon 4y ago
      I thought we were assuming everything was on the level on the basis of Autumn Sorrells' credentials?