There was no hacking material and no evidence that it could be based on such material. You repeat what they intentionally used as "reason" fully aware that it i

There was no hacking material and no evidence that it could be based on such material. You repeat what they intentionally used as "reason" fully aware that it isn't. Heck even if the new articles about the topic would have used hacked material as source it dint not include that material itself and thus wound not fall under that policy anyway. Not even articles about a confirmed hacks fall under this policy even if the hack is confirmed with the hacked material itself. This is and was a excuse from the very start.