3 ms·

I tried to copy paste the Advent of Code puzzles into the chat, and it just spewed out code that worked like it was nothing. It worked for the day 1 and day 2 p

I tried to copy paste the Advent of Code puzzles into the chat, and it just spewed out code that worked like it was nothing. It worked for the day 1 and day 2 puzzels. I’m impressed it also “remembered” that I wanted the result as JavaScript

bugfix-66 4y ago
- EMIRELADERO 4y ago
  Why are you so snarky? Yes, of course this won't solve things it has never seen in its training set. It's not an AGI. But so what? It's still amazing nontheless. Is your point that since it's not "intelligent" we should dismiss it?
  - buzzerbetrayed 4y ago
    I had to go back and reread GPs comment because I didn’t sense any snark the first time. Still not sure if I do.
    - bugfix-66 4y ago
      That's right. There was no snark intended.
  - cercatrova 4y ago
    I've interacted with that account before and they were always snarky, as if their test they made is the arbiter of intelligence and that we shouldn't be so impressed by AI that to me is actually impressive.
    - bugfix-66 4y ago
      You don't test on the training set. Everybody in ML (e.g., me) knows that. But that's what we're seeing. I'm saying: "Here's a test outside the training set."
  - NavinF 4y ago
    He's just spamming his website in every thread related to ML. The snark gets more attention.
    - bugfix-66 4y ago
      [flagged]
      - dang 4y ago
        You can't do this here. I've banned the account, and have redacted the identifying info from your comment. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
        NavinF 4y ago
        Ooh could you email me what he said? It's in my profile. Really curious what sort of identifying info of me he was showing off.
jasonjmcghee 4y ago
For what it's worth, this is likely one of the easier puzzles you could give it because there are so many solutions in a number of languages all over the web.
- avarun 4y ago
  The training set is limited to 2021 and earlier and it sounds like the GP asked for solutions to yesterday's Advent of Code puzzle.
  - BurnerBotje 4y ago
    Yes correct. It does however still explain in detail what needs to happen (I omitted the results for the sample data’s).

bugfix-66 4y ago

EMIRELADERO 4y ago
Why are you so snarky? Yes, of course this won't solve things it has never seen in its training set. It's not an AGI. But so what? It's still amazing nontheless. Is your point that since it's not "intelligent" we should dismiss it?
- buzzerbetrayed 4y ago
  I had to go back and reread GPs comment because I didn’t sense any snark the first time. Still not sure if I do.
  - bugfix-66 4y ago
    That's right. There was no snark intended.
- cercatrova 4y ago
  I've interacted with that account before and they were always snarky, as if their test they made is the arbiter of intelligence and that we shouldn't be so impressed by AI that to me is actually impressive.
  - bugfix-66 4y ago
    You don't test on the training set. Everybody in ML (e.g., me) knows that. But that's what we're seeing. I'm saying: "Here's a test outside the training set."
- NavinF 4y ago
  He's just spamming his website in every thread related to ML. The snark gets more attention.
  - bugfix-66 4y ago
    [flagged]
    - dang 4y ago
      You can't do this here. I've banned the account, and have redacted the identifying info from your comment. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
      - NavinF 4y ago
        Ooh could you email me what he said? It's in my profile. Really curious what sort of identifying info of me he was showing off.

jasonjmcghee 4y ago

For what it's worth, this is likely one of the easier puzzles you could give it because there are so many solutions in a number of languages all over the web.

avarun 4y ago
The training set is limited to 2021 and earlier and it sounds like the GP asked for solutions to yesterday's Advent of Code puzzle.
- BurnerBotje 4y ago
  Yes correct. It does however still explain in detail what needs to happen (I omitted the results for the sample data’s).