Most of this is not a new posting -- just the material at the top. She is using dangerous language -- talking about children, and about counterfeit goods which

Most of this is not a new posting -- just the material at the top. She is using dangerous language -- talking about children, and about counterfeit goods which harm lives. She makes it seem as if one must be for SOPA if they want to be against harming children or counterfeit goods. But that's not a logical conclusion. You can be for helping children and against SOPA. In fact, I'd imagine that would describe just about everyone who opposes SOPA. SOPA is far reaching. SOPA is terrible and needs to be stopped. I'm all for something that stops the harm of children and the spread of counterfeit goods, but that's not what the SOPA debate is actually about. So let's focus on SOPA and not get misdirected by Ms. Jones.