1 tribe is on a coast facing the Pacific. Two of the three tribes are located on rivers. Yet the headline lays the blame at the feet of 'climate change': ...

1 tribe is on a coast facing the Pacific. Two of the three tribes are located on rivers. Yet the headline lays the blame at the feet of 'climate change': ...have been severely impacted by the effects of climate change... ...ticking clock ... climate The instance of the Pacific coast could be seen, in part, related to climate change. However, the other two, are facing what rivers have done since the beginning of time -- erosion. The headline is just a long way over-the-top versus the evidence described in the body. Moreover, the body of the article seems to speak ONLY of climate change being the reason for the payments/move, though it does suggest other, non-climate threats (tsunami, for example).