4 ms·

Practically speaking it doesn't really eliminate the need for a radio system entirely, since you would still want a control interface that isn't dependent on su

Practically speaking it doesn't really eliminate the need for a radio system entirely, since you would still want a control interface that isn't dependent on such a sensitive technology (ie you would want to be able to fix the satellite if some software or tracking error makes it unable to accurately target a Starlink satellite). What this does mean is that the bandwidth restrictions for transmitting larger amounts of data become a bit looser and become much harder for adversaries to detect and track.

rapjr9 4y ago
That makes sense. The radio system could be a much lower power, low baud rate system though, enough to transmit commands and get a little telemetry but much smaller than would be required for constant communication with Earth. This may also be relevant: "NRL Engineers Ready Innovative Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS) Payload for Launch" https://www.nrl.navy.mil/Media/News/Article/3214111/nrl-engineers-ready-innovative-robotic-servicing-of-geosynchronous-satellites-r/ https://www.nrl.navy.mil/Media/News/Article/3214111/nrl-engi... Starshield as a "space network as a service" and robots as a "repair service for space infrastructure". Seems like together these could make doing things in space cheaper and easier. Both would require very well defined standards.