4 ms·
This post too is arguably misinformation, selectively reporting the findings that would cause you to distrust the laptop and not reporting the reasons to trust
by gregw2 4y ago
This post too is arguably misinformation, selectively reporting the findings that would cause you to distrust the laptop and not reporting the reasons to trust various things on the laptop.
You could also summarize the findings as “no evidence of tampered emails or hacking was found on the laptop”. But you didn’t (and I wouldn’t) as that too would be disingenuous.
Neither summary is a fair framing, particularly for techies.
For at least some of the details, see the march 2022 Washington Post article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-biden-laptop-data-examined/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/30/hunter-... or https://archive.ph/b1Ser https://archive.ph/b1Ser
- lyu07282 4y agoMy post? It was basically a summary of Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunter_Biden_laptop_controvers... But let me guess Wikipedia is also part of the fake news media?
- throwaway35i2 4y agoThis isn't a primary source (there are no links to the raw data for analysis) here so this post too is arguably misinformation, as it's selectively reporting findings.