51 ms·
It didn't violate any ToS though.
by pastacacioepepe 4y ago
It didn't violate any ToS though.
- bhaak 4y agoIt did. Involuntary pornography.
- acdha 4y agoHis nudes definitely did: > Sharing explicit sexual images or videos of someone online without their consent is a violation of their privacy and one of the most serious violations of the Twitter Rules. In addition to posing serious safety and security risks, it may also result in physical, emotional, and financial hardship for the person whose media is shared. The hacked content in general is covered by this. Given the contents, it doesn’t appear that the news exemption covers most of the material: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materials https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/hacked-materi...