5 ms·
It didn't violate any ToS though.
by PathOfEclipse 4y ago
It didn't violate any ToS though.
- arcticfox 4y agoThese were Hunter Biden dick pics specifically. I am no expert on the Twitter TOS but involuntary pornography seems like it is probably on there.
- sjwalter 4y agoWhat about the hundreds of pics of Hunter smoking crack in a bathrobe? What about the emails wherein Hunter describes in some detail his influence peddling operation? "10% for the big guy." Everyone focusing on Hunter's nudes are eliding the real story that Twitter buried. That is, the hard evidence that Biden is corrupt.
- xcrunner529 4y agoThat is not any hard evidence of Joe Bide . The only thing it’s hard evidence of is his drug addict son saying things to try and get ahead. It’s like you need to go back to school.
- candybar 4y agoPeople aren't focusing on Hunter's nudes - that's what Matt Taibbi shared as an example of the requests made by the Biden campaign. If you actually look at the request, again, specifically chosen by Matt Taibbi as an example of a problematic conversation between the political campaign and Twitter, it was a request to remove Hunter Biden nudes. That's what Matt Taibbi specifically decided to share, despite presumably having access to all of this supposedly problematic interactions. That's pretty strong evidence that not much else was going on - if the Biden campaign was trying to suppress more problematic narratives that had to do with corruption, why wasn't this evidence presented?
- Pastureyes 4y agoYou fools looking for a mole in a rabbit hole I smell traitors yo the constitution a violation of American vote values the rest of us follow except dump
- Pastureyes 4y agoOk fools you don’t get it there was nothing out of the ordinary here but you all want yo get your jollies while s sitting president allowed traitors into the white house with no security and his daughter profited on china deals his son don jr took dark money from putin I’ll wait for your response with sone sort of Fox News reality retort . Ok
- spamizbad 4y agoIt’s against the rules to post non-consensual nudes on Twitter.
- acdha 4y agoIt most certainly does violate their terms of service: the main terms require you to have copyright permission & any other rights for everything you post and there’s an entire policy specifically banning non-consensual content: https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/intimate-media https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/intimate-medi... This page goes back to 2018, too, so it’s hardly new: https://web.archive.org/web/20180103200035/https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/intimate-media https://web.archive.org/web/20180103200035/https://help.twit... > Sharing explicit sexual images or videos of someone online without their consent is a violation of their privacy and one of the most serious violations of the Twitter Rules. In addition to posing serious safety and security risks, it may also result in physical, emotional, and financial hardship for the person whose media is shared.
- PathOfEclipse 4y agoI was referring to the laptop tweets. The official reason for censoring then was that they referred to hacked materials, but that was untrue as was admitted internally.
- acdha 4y agoReally? You didn’t mention that at the time and this thread was specifically based on a set of tweets which are were non-consensual nudity.
- PathOfEclipse 4y agoYou're right in that I wasn't paying ose enough attention to this particular comment chain before commenting.
- ngetchell 4y agoRevenge porn is illegal in most of America and also a violation of ToS.