3 ms·
It's weirder to use the false equivalence to equate Biden with a typical private citizen. The typical private citizen does not have the same power to suppress s
by hgfdhgdfhgdf 4y ago
It's weirder to use the false equivalence to equate Biden with a typical private citizen. The typical private citizen does not have the same power to suppress stories on Twitter.
- eggnet 4y agoBecause the first amendment covers congress's limitations on lawmaking. Thereby indirectly limiting executive and judicial actions in the same way. It doesn't cover someone (regardless of influence or position) asking a company to review content against their own terms of service and policies.
- misnome 4y agoThe typical private citizen can click the “Report” button. They just can’t email a list of tweets to report directly to the review team. Apparently this private citizen could do that, as could the sitting president.
- bentlegen 4y agoDo people here not believe that it’s normal for powerful, connected people to have “red phone” access to people high-up in corporations, media, etc? There are entire industries that exist to get you that access (if you don’t have it). e.g. I believe Tim Cook could probably contact someone at Twitter and get an answer. Do we really believe he would go in the same queue as a “regular” citizen? To me this is a shocking revelation to anyone who doesn’t actually understand how the world works. Which, to be fair, I didn’t either for a good while, and empathize.
- tootie 4y agoI'm sure every top account had this access too. Dril probably has direct access to the mod team.