> You could always deploy an actual sidecar that runs Extism -- but we believe operationally it is far simpler to eliminate other deployments and run WASM in-pr

> You could always deploy an actual sidecar that runs Extism -- but we believe operationally it is far simpler to eliminate other deployments and run WASM in-process as it was designed to do. Ah, yeah, actually, I can see this (focusing on just local and in process). As mentioned, 95% of the time (probably higher), it seems like sidecars are used locally anyways, so having the simplest way to use sidecars/plugins could be super beneficial. Will give Extism a try. ... and WASM for proxy type stuff sounds super interesting too:)