4 ms·

Google's product is not Chrome. Google's product is not search. Google's product is advertising. Search is how they deliver it, and browsers are how they del

Google's product is not Chrome. Google's product is not search. Google's product is advertising. Search is how they deliver it, and browsers are how they deliver THAT. Google doesn't care, financially speaking, if Chrome or Firefox does better in the marketplace. They care about the eyeballs that Firefox, Chrome, and any other browser can deliver to Google ads.

davidu 15y ago
This is very wrong. Google cares deeply if Chrome wins. You are being way too narrow in your focus. Advertising is not their product, it's their revenue stream. Their product is _everything_ that sits between a user and monetizing an ad. Just look at what they have done from an engineering, offensive and defensive position here. It's all about that ethereal space between users and monetization. That's the battlefield, and they want all of it. They need FF because when Chrome dominates, FF needs to be a viable competitor. With Bing, it would be worse off.
- zobzu 15y ago
  True, but also, if Chrome wins, it means they don't have to care about these deals too much anymore. Because right now is Firefox switches search engine, it's very bad for Google. Chrome will never switch. So, yeah. That and that they can use Chrome to lock people into Google services in the future.
  - shoota 15y ago
    Actually, Chrome gives the user a choice of search engine on first startup and does not have a default browser ( at least in the United States)
    - davidu 15y ago
      This is true, but it's also theatre.
  - drivebyacct2 15y ago
    >That and that they can use Chrome to lock people into Google services in the future. Oh no, not more Chrome proves Google is evil... The only thing I've seen from Google that is a move in this direction is that it will share the oAuth cookie between Chrome Sync and google.com pages to auto login if you're already logged into the browser. I don't see how Chrome "locks people into Google services" any more than simply enabling them to get there faster (V8, SPDY, etc).

davidu 15y ago

This is very wrong. Google cares deeply if Chrome wins. You are being way too narrow in your focus. Advertising is not their product, it's their revenue stream. Their product is _everything_ that sits between a user and monetizing an ad. Just look at what they have done from an engineering, offensive and defensive position here. It's all about that ethereal space between users and monetization. That's the battlefield, and they want all of it. They need FF because when Chrome dominates, FF needs to be a viable competitor. With Bing, it would be worse off.

zobzu 15y ago
True, but also, if Chrome wins, it means they don't have to care about these deals too much anymore. Because right now is Firefox switches search engine, it's very bad for Google. Chrome will never switch. So, yeah. That and that they can use Chrome to lock people into Google services in the future.
- shoota 15y ago
  Actually, Chrome gives the user a choice of search engine on first startup and does not have a default browser ( at least in the United States)
  - davidu 15y ago
    This is true, but it's also theatre.
- drivebyacct2 15y ago
  >That and that they can use Chrome to lock people into Google services in the future. Oh no, not more Chrome proves Google is evil... The only thing I've seen from Google that is a move in this direction is that it will share the oAuth cookie between Chrome Sync and google.com pages to auto login if you're already logged into the browser. I don't see how Chrome "locks people into Google services" any more than simply enabling them to get there faster (V8, SPDY, etc).