> Nearly four of five Americans who’ve been following the Hunter Biden laptop scandal believe that “truthful” coverage would have changed the outcome of the 202

> Nearly four of five Americans who’ve been following the Hunter Biden laptop scandal believe that “truthful” coverage would have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, according to a new poll. > A similar percentage also said they’re convinced that information on the computer is real, with just 11% saying they thought it was “created by Russia,” according to the survey conducted by the New Jersey-based Technometrica Institute of Policy and Politics. So, if you were following the (as described) scandal, you the majority believes that "truthful" coverage would have changed things. The same percentage believes that the computer is real. So... the people who believe that there is something to the scandal also believe that if there was "truthful" coverage of the scandal, things would have been different. I'm not sure that this is as convincing of a statistic as the numbers by themselves would lead one to believe.